Elaine Altman for State Senate

23 Jun

Elaine Altman is a teacher with 24 years of experience. She’s running for State Senate against Mike Ranzenhofer, a career politician with a weak record. Unfunded Albany mandates and the outright theft of public school funding to help balance Albany’s spendthrift ways, she’s marketing herself with the social media hashtag #sendateachertoAlbany. 

She is advocating for greater investment in public services, fair taxes and fair funding for public education, mandates that support teaching and learning, rather than tests, tests, and more tests. 

The Amherst Democratic Committee is hosting a $25 fundraiser for Altman today from 5:30 – 7:30 at Loughran’s at 4543 Main Street. Anyone who wants to go to Albany to fight for stronger public education is worth a listen. 

Advertisements

28 Responses to “Elaine Altman for State Senate”

  1. James Hyzy June 23, 2014 at 8:56 am #

    Elaine is a good person, very intelligent, and a highly professional teacher. She would make an excellent state senator, I wish her the best in this difficult race.

    • wnyresident June 24, 2014 at 11:53 pm #

      Wouldn’t she really make a better teacher seeing she is a “highly professional teacher”?

      • Alan Bedenko June 25, 2014 at 9:47 am #

        Wait a second. So, we’re supposed to only hire politicians to government? Wouldn’t Mike Ranzenhofer make a better lawyer? Wouldn’t Chris Collins make a better venture capitalist? Wouldn’t David DiPietro make a better dry cleaner? Give me a break.

      • wnyresident June 25, 2014 at 11:11 am #

        You give me a break.

        I am not saying she is any less or more qualified than Mike.

        Campaign slogans such as:

        fair funding for all schools? How so? What is fair? Does she want to increase budgets across the board for all schools?

        Mandates which positively support teaching and learning? As in? Mandates currently are putting a burden on local school budgets and she want more of them?

        Investment in public services? As in larger more costly government? Higher salaries? Where does she think an investments should go?

        Fair taxes for all? Who decides what is fair? What does she think is fair? That is the question.

        Reforms to keep New York graduates, businesses and residents in are state? Examples?

      • Alan Bedenko June 27, 2014 at 5:39 am #

        Fair funding for schools: getting rid of the Gap Elimination Adjustment, which robs school districts throughout the state to balance the state budget.

        I’m not on Elaine’s fucking campaign staff, so if you have specific questions about policy, why not throw them her way? I am in favor of anyone who (a) isn’t Mike Ranzenhofer; and (b) believes that schools are underfunded and over-mandated. I answered your questions about public services. (I thought you liked roads and infrastructure).

      • wnyresident June 27, 2014 at 5:05 pm #

        Oh not her campaign staff? Well you tend to be the mouthpiece for the party she is registered in. If you don’t know the details of her agenda other than her campaign slogans why are you promoting her?

      • Alan Bedenko June 28, 2014 at 7:11 am #

        Because she’s a Democrat, I’m a Democratic committeeman in the district she’s running in, and because Mike Ranzenhofer is a useless Republican seatcover who’s had 20+ years in public service with nothing to show for it.

      • wnyresident July 1, 2014 at 8:22 pm #

        Do you are just a low information voter swayed by campaign slogans… 🙂

        A lot of elected leaders have been in public service for 20+ years and nothing to show for it.

      • wnyresident June 27, 2014 at 1:00 am #

        Alan do you know the answers to any of the questions I posted below? Or are you just going with her based on some campaign slogans and that she is a Democrat?

  2. hwhamlin June 23, 2014 at 4:32 pm #

    Translation from political hack-speak to English:
    “greater investment in public services”
    =
    “more government spending”

    • Kevin Hickey June 23, 2014 at 6:53 pm #

      Oh no!!!!

  3. wnyresident June 23, 2014 at 9:06 pm #

    Alan?

    “greater investment in public services”

    Define that.

    • Alan Bedenko June 24, 2014 at 6:06 am #

      Spending more money on things that people use .

  4. tongram June 24, 2014 at 1:01 am #

    Razenhofer is a do nothing but it seems that district does not know how to vote any line but
    Rep

    • UncleBluck June 24, 2014 at 7:24 am #

      That because his district was gerrymandered by the reps. in 2010 just like Collins district…..although it was already leaning rep.

  5. Intheknowinbflo June 26, 2014 at 1:47 pm #

    So is Mrs. Altman going to represent all of us or just the teachers? NYSUT’s insider in the senate. Wonderful.

    • Alan Bedenko June 26, 2014 at 3:08 pm #

      She’ll represent more of “us” than Ranzenhofer.

      • Intheknowinbflo July 2, 2014 at 1:44 pm #

        Doubt it. She’s been in a district where performance keeps sliding, the socio-economic climate is declining and the wages keep rising – over $100,000.00 a year to run the staff development center. More funding = more taxes.

  6. wnyresident July 5, 2014 at 1:24 pm #

    Another thought came to mind. Alan seeing you are promoting her do you know her stance on illegal immigration? Alan what is your view? Are you going to promote candidates that want open borders ?

    • Alan Bedenko July 7, 2014 at 9:47 am #

      Holy shit, the stupidity of this question is worthy of a post of its own.

      • wnyresident July 7, 2014 at 10:23 am #

        Start a post! Good idea. What is your view on allowing anyone and any body to just enter into the USA illegally?

      • Alan Bedenko July 7, 2014 at 10:30 am #

        Stupid question, that’s what!

      • wnyresident July 7, 2014 at 10:47 am #

        Answer the question.

        What is your view on allowing anyone and any body to just enter into the USA illegally?

        I can answer it. I am against it.

      • Alan Bedenko July 7, 2014 at 11:16 am #

        Brave man! You’ll have to wait until tomorrow morning for my post, but in the meantime, I note that you haven’t yet condemned pedophile birthday clowns. Why do you support pedophile birthday clowns, Tony?

      • wnyresident July 7, 2014 at 12:05 pm #

        Did I say you support illegal immigration? No. I asked “What is your view on allowing anyone and any body to just enter into the USA illegally?” Either you support it or you don’t.

        Clowns creep me out. For the record I would not allow pedophiles to be birthday clowns or any position that would put them into contact with children.

      • Alan Bedenko July 7, 2014 at 12:24 pm #

        Tony, your question was stupid.

        Nobody supports “allowing anyone and any body to just enter into the USA illegally”.

      • wnyresident July 7, 2014 at 1:07 pm #

        It is not a stupid question. Currently the Obama Administration doesn’t seem to be doing anything to stop what is going on currently. What are they doing? They are transporting the people who are crossing the border illegally deeper into the USA.

      • Alan Bedenko July 7, 2014 at 1:52 pm #

        1. Ours is a nation of laws;
        2. Our laws say you cannot deport someone without due process – even more complicated, a “2008 law guarantees unaccompanied minors from those countries access to a federal asylum officer and a chance to tell a U.S. judge that they were victims of a crime or face abuse or sexual trafficking if they are sent home. If the claim is deemed credible, judges may grant a waiver from immediate deportation. Word of mouth gets back, and now people are calling and saying, ‘This is what I said'” in court, said a senior U.S. law enforcement official, who was not authorized to speak on the record. “Whether it is true or not, the perception is that they are successfully entering the United States…. That is what is driving up the landings.”;
        3. Because you cannot summarily deport anyone, you need to house/detain them in order to let the legal process take its course;
        4. While it would seem ideal to house and detain them closer to the border, this has proven to be untenable due to the humanitarian concerns at issue.
        5. This: “They often turn themselves over to authorities immediately after crossing the river, following the advice of smugglers, friends and relatives, who tell them they will eventually be released and allowed to continue to their destination.”

        “For parents with young children, that has largely been true because the U.S. has only one long-term family detention facility in Pennsylvania, and it’s full. Most parents are handed notices to appear at the immigration office closest to their destination and dropped off at bus stations across the Southwest.”
        6. Read that whole article and you’ll note that this wave of immigrants is – on questionable advice – SURRENDERING TO LAW ENFORCEMENT once across the border. This is a unique and largely unprecedented situation, as undocumented immigrants typically work to avoid law enforcement.

Contribute To The Conversation

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: