Tag Archives: money

County Leg: Making it Rain

23 May

The County Legislature bipartisanly took the bold step of literally just wildly throwing money – $5 million of it – at the beleaguered road network. Surely our roads are in need of repair, thanks to a brutal and relentless winter, but is it too much to ask Republican legislators to actually set up a plan, or maybe name some priorities, before they shame everyone to spend money so prospective opponents can’t label them as anti-road? 

Seriously. This kind of spending is typically what Republicans criticize Democrats for.  But it’s ok if it’s roads, because almost all county roads are in the suburban districts. 

We need to review the county road network, which grew without control under the old Board of Supervisors, and determine what roads should be maintained by the regional government, and which should revert to local control. 

The Morning Grumpy – 7/9/12

9 Jul

All the news, views, and filtered excellence fit to consume during your morning grumpy.

97% of people who enjoy roomy booths also enjoy print newspapers.

1. The Editor of The Buffalo News, Margaret Sullivan, hosted a live chat with readers and subscribers of the newspaper on July 5th. In it, she addressed several questions, but I’d like to focus on a series of exchanges regarding the new paywall digital subscription service the newspaper plans to implement this coming fall.

Reader: Hi, Margaret. What’s the reaction been to the News’ plans to move to digital subscriptions?

Margaret Sullivan: The reaction has been quite positive. People do seem to understand that news gathering is an expensive business and many of them are willing to pay for it in the digital as well as print form, especially since the cost will be quite low — and free to subscribers.

One might think that the challenges presented by declining revenue and a shrinking print subscriber base might push the venerable paper of record to embrace technology, develop new revenue streams, and incent their readers to slowly move to the online version of the product. After all, the online version comes with much less overhead and embracing this opportunity is in the long-term interests of the company. Instead, I was surprised to read that Ms. Sullivan sees this as an opportunity to leverage demand for online content as a means to boost flagging print revenue. Bizarre, I know.

Reader: What’s Plan B if you find out that nobody wants to pay for the News online?

Margaret Sullivan: Newspapers are experimenting, all over the country, with how to survive in a vastly different world. If something doesn’t work, we’ll try something else. It’s important to keep the printed newspaper healthy, which this plan is designed to do. (emphasis mine – CS) It’s also important to develop new ways of making money, such as expanding into commercial printing and distribution. The News has made some big gains there, too.

What she is saying is that The Buffalo News is in the newspaper business, not the journalism business. They are not the same thing. Meaning the product – the thing they produce – is the printed copy of the daily news, not the news itself. It’s a telling statement. The editors and staff will certainly give all sorts of high-minded statements about the mission of The Buffalo News, its editorial direction, and how they believe providing news and features is a sacred trust with the public. And they would be correct. The editorial mission of The Buffalo News and the quality and scope of their news organization is vital to a healthy and informed community. But, when you get down to brass tacks, the owners and management believe they are managing a printing company.

If they didn’t believe that, why would the pricing plan for their online product be designed to drive print subscriptions?  If a reader wants a single day of unlimited online access to the journalism product, he/she is asked to pay $.99. If that same reader only wants access to the printed version of that same content, he/she would pay $.75.  Yes, it’s $.24 cheaper for a customer to purchase a newspaper that has been printed on multimillion dollar equipment using expensive ink, bundled by union workers, placed on diesel trucks and driven and delivered to stores throughout the area than to read the content online.

If a reader doesn’t have a print subscription, he/she will be able to buy a digital subscription for $2.49 a week. Sounds like a deal, right? Let’s crunch the numbers.

The Sunday paper’s newsstand price will be increased to $2.50 later this month. Of course, if you’re a home subscriber to the Sunday edition of the newspaper, you’ll only pay$1.99 for the newspaper. That special subscription rate also entitles you to unlimited/24-7 access to the online content. So, which option will most people choose? If they are rational, they’ll pay $.50 less per week for the physical newspaper/online combination, which allows The Buffalo News to artificially increase Sunday subscriber rates and charge regional and national advertisers higher rates for advertisements and coupon placement in that Sunday edition. This pricing structure reinforces Ms. Sullivan’s point that the digital subscription service is a means to sustain the print newspaper.

Again, just so I am not misunderstood, traditional and establishment media is important. I value The Buffalo News, but I want to see them embrace technology and innovate, not just stem losses on a balance sheet and sustain a dying business model. The Internet is changing everything, and an attempt to replicate an old business model onto it is not a recipe for success. As Jeff Jarvis wrote, paywalls might boost short term revenue, but they also generate long term costs to journalism.

Alan Rusbridger, the innovative editor of the Guardian in London, just delivered a monumental speech arguing that charging “removes you from the way people the world over now connect with each other. You cannot control distribution or create scarcity without becoming isolated from this new networked world.”

There is a huge business opportunity for someone to build a nimble, multimedia, web-savvy, digital news product in this town that hires hungry young reporters, mixes in a dash of old graybeards for credibility, and takes on The Buffalo News where they are weak and blind, on the web. Maybe it’s time to start working on that business plan again.

2. Everything you need to know about Mitt Romney in one Venn Diagram.

3. The money-empathy gap, new research suggests that more money makes people act less human. Or at least less humane.

This research is not intended to prosecute the one percent, those families with an average net worth of $14 million. Nor does it attempt to apply its conclusions about the selfishness and solipsism of a broad social stratum to every member within it: Gateses and Carnegies have obviously saved lives and edified generations, and one of the biggest predictors of a person’s inclination to donate to charity is how much money he has. But when the top fifth of American families have seen their incomes rise by 45 percent since 1979, whereas the bottom fifth has seen a decline of almost 11 percent, these ­researchers want to explore a timely question: How does living in an environment defined by individual achievement—­measured by money, privilege, and ­status—alter a person’s mental machinery to the point where he begins to see the people around him only as aids or obstacles to his own ambitions?

A long, but very interesting read.

4. The conscience of America, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I, VT), gave a robust and rollicking speech on the floor of the United States Senate on June 27th. He takes on Wall Street in the way I wish more of our Senators would and should.

“The Federal Reserve provided a jaw dropping $16 trillion dollars in virtually zero-interest loans to every major financial institution in this country … why can’t they move to protect homeowners, unemployed workers, and the middle class?”

Wall Street got everything it wanted. What did we get? Incredibly powerful.

5. Thinking about a degree from University of Phoenix or some such similar for-profit “university”, you might want to think again.

A new study from two Boston University economists finds that students at for-profit schools fail to receive any wage boost from obtaining a certificate or associate’s degree. “There is little evidence of a return to any certificate or degree from a for-profit,” the researchers write in a new paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Meanwhile, people with legitimate degrees from public or private not-for-profit universities do receive a significant wage premium after completing their education. In 2010, FRONTLINE did a fantastic hour long expose on the predatory practices of for-profit schools. Absolutely worth watching if you’ve never seen it.

Fact Of The Day: AT&T has a database known as “Hawkeye” that contains 312 terabytes of data detailing nearly every telephone communication on AT&T’s domestic network since 2001

Quote Of The Day: “The weak hate not wickedness but weakness; and one instance of their hatred of weakness is hatred of self.” – Eric Hoffer

Video Of The Day: “This is our planet a.k.a ‘Space Station Porn'”

Song Of The Day: “Potholes In My Lawn” – De La Soul

Follow me on Twitter for the “incremental grumpy” @ChrisSmithAV

Email me links, tips, story ideas: chris@artvoice.com

Paladino Helping Clear Cuomo’s Path

16 Jul

It’s campaign disclosure time! The most closely-watched race this year is, naturally, the race for governor.

On the one hand, we have a candidate with a grassroots groundswell of support, with literally thousands of donations from regular folks donating less than $1,000.

And on the other hand, we have mad-as-Mel-Gibson Carl Paladino.

As of this morning, Rick Lazio’s numbers are suspected to be so dismal that he’s waiting until the last moment to disclose his take.

Paladino reported having raised $1.7 million for his gubernatorial run – $1.6 of it, or roughly 94% from his own fortune. He has pledged to spend up to $10 million for his campaign. Just over $100,000 came from individuals and businesses, almost all of them in WNY. Special mention goes to Jim Ostrowski, who pulled in close to $10,000 for “consulting”, Rus Thompson, who pulled in about $20,000, and Michael Caputo, who had a fantastic $93,000 month of June (I’m assuming that figure includes paying for the use of his boat as Paladino wasted his time sailing it down the anachronistic, socialistic Erie Canal), and a grand total of close to $300k. Good job, guys!

Paladino also filed 28,000 petition signatures, just under double the required amount. That likely gives him enough of a cushion in the event that Lazio files a challenge. I suspect that all the bluster last week about Paladino having trouble with this task was overblown puffery to motivate the teabagging masses.

Andrew Cuomo, the Democratic nominee, raised $9.2 million and spent about the same amount as Paladino – $1.6MM. Combined with his prior figures, Cuomo now has $23.6 million cash on-hand. The Daily News goes on to report that over the last six month, Cuomo’s campaign received just under 4,000 donations, 70% of which were for less than $1,000.

In other words, mindful of the fact that Democrats hold a 27% enrollment advantage, Carl Paladino’s efforts to split the right-of-center vote continue apace, resulting in an even-more-inevitable Cuomo landslide.


29 Jan

Adama makes a good point in this post about the difference between progressive activists and conservative ones.

Conservative activists, agitators, and provacateurs can find easy funding and comfortable subsidies from everyone from creepy parafascist billionaires to deep pocketed business interests.

Progressive activists, for the most part, don’t have a pot to piss in. Some wealthy donors fund certain projects – George Soros comes to mind – but there’s no liberal version of douche vandal James O’Keefe III.

Money & What It’s Spent On

4 Dec

Jim Heaney discovers that the Buffalo Schools’ legal bills for its ill-fated unilateral switch to a single health insurer for its employees amounts to $252,000.

Gee, for that change, the district could have pursued disciplinary action against McKinley High School Principal Crystal Barton. Williams nixed the idea, saying it would cost too much.

Naturally, the school district was unsuccessful in its attempt to unilaterally changing things, it’s out a quarter of a million dollars, and James Williams and Phil Rumore still aren’t on each other’s Christmas card lists.

Tsk tsk.

Money Savings

13 Jun

I know we don’t have car-sharing programs like ZipCar in Buffalo, but thought that this story out of Philadelphia was rather innovative and forward-thinking:

The city of Philadelphia has found a new way to cut expenses by eliminating vehicles from its city fleet. However, many city employees still need to get around sometimes. They’ve decided adopt the car-sharing model and they put out a request for bids. It’s been announced that ZipCar has been awarded a new contract to provide car-sharing services for municipal employees. Philadelphia has already eliminated 330 vehicles from its fleet over the last 4 years and this new deal will expand on that. The ZipCar contract starts on July 1 for a year and may be extended for another three years. ZipCar is offering hybrid vehicles in Philadelphia from $6/hour.

Like the article suggests, car-sharing services enables carless city dwellers to become members of the service and reserve cars for occasional use (grocery store, IKEA runs, etc.). They pay per hour and gas, insurance, and dedicated parking are all included (quite handy in cities where off-street parking costs as much as a private school education and on-street parking is scarce). 150 free kilometers is included for each rental, plus an additional $0.25/km over that.

For a municipality, it beats operating and insuring its own fleet.

Over the course of the contract, city employees will have access to Zipcar’s diverse fleet selection, including hybrids, standard sedans, and small SUVs, ensuring access to the most appropriate car for their task. Recent studies by Zipcar indicate that each Zipcar takes 15 vehicles off the road and Zipcar members report that they drive an average of 4,000 miles per year less than when they owned a car. Members also report saving an average of $435 per month compared to the average cost of owning and operating a vehicle in an urban setting.

(Photo from Flickr Member M.V. Jantzen)