Obama Speaks to the Children

7 Sep

I’m stealing this wholesale from a Facebook friend of mine:

Despite the warnings of right-wing radio hosts, and fully cognizant that my children risk learning a lesson in civics, I, nonetheless, grant them permission to watch a televised address by the duly-elected leader of these United States, President Barack Obama, on the controversial subject of the importance of school.

It’s a great speech that any kid should hear from the funny-named President of the US.  A little inspiration never hurt anyone, and neither did an exhortation to study and work hard.

The speech itself has already been posted to teh internets.  You can read it after the jump if you’re too lazy to click your mouse, like Leonard Stokes walking from his car to a supermarket entrance

Hello everyone – how’s everybody doing today? I’m here with students at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. And we’ve got students tuning in from all across America, kindergarten through twelfth grade. I’m glad you all could join us today.
I know that for many of you, today is the first day of school. And for those of you in kindergarten, or starting middle or high school, it’s your first day in a new school, so it’s understandable if you’re a little nervous. I imagine there are some seniors out there who are feeling pretty good right now, with just one more year to go. And no matter what grade you’re in, some of you are probably wishing it were still summer, and you could’ve stayed in bed just a little longer this morning.

I know that feeling. When I was young, my family lived in Indonesia for a few years, and my mother didn’t have the money to send me where all the American kids went to school. So she decided to teach me extra lessons herself, Monday through Friday – at 4:30 in the morning.

Now I wasn’t too happy about getting up that early. A lot of times, I’d fall asleep right there at the kitchen table. But whenever I’d complain, my mother would just give me one of those looks and say, “This is no picnic for me either, buster.”

So I know some of you are still adjusting to being back at school. But I’m here today because I have something important to discuss with you. I’m here because I want to talk with you about your education and what’s expected of all of you in this new school year.

Now I’ve given a lot of speeches about education. And I’ve talked a lot about responsibility.

I’ve talked about your teachers’ responsibility for inspiring you, and pushing you to learn.

I’ve talked about your parents’ responsibility for making sure you stay on track, and get your homework done, and don’t spend every waking hour in front of the TV or with that Xbox.

I’ve talked a lot about your government’s responsibility for setting high standards, supporting teachers and principals, and turning around schools that aren’t working where students aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve.

But at the end of the day, we can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, and the best schools in the world – and none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities. Unless you show up to those schools; pay attention to those teachers; listen to your parents, grandparents and other adults; and put in the hard work it takes to succeed.
And that’s what I want to focus on today: the responsibility each of you has for your education. I want to start with the responsibility you have to yourself.

Every single one of you has something you’re good at. Every single one of you has something to offer. And you have a responsibility to yourself to discover what that is. That’s the opportunity an education can provide.

Maybe you could be a good writer – maybe even good enough to write a book or articles in a newspaper – but you might not know it until you write a paper for your English class. Maybe you could be an innovator or an inventor – maybe even good enough to come up with the next iPhone or a new medicine or vaccine – but you might not know it until you do a project for your science class. Maybe you could be a mayor or a Senator or a Supreme Court Justice, but you might not know that until you join student government or the debate team.

And no matter what you want to do with your life – I guarantee that you’ll need an education to do it. You want to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a police officer? You want to be a nurse or an architect, a lawyer or a member of our military? You’re going to need a good education for every single one of those careers. You can’t drop out of school and just drop into a good job. You’ve got to work for it and train for it and learn for it.

And this isn’t just important for your own life and your own future. What you make of your education will decide nothing less than the future of this country. What you’re learning in school today will determine whether we as a nation can meet our greatest challenges in the future.

You’ll need the knowledge and problem-solving skills you learn in science and math to cure diseases like cancer and AIDS, and to develop new energy technologies and protect our environment. You’ll need the insights and critical thinking skills you gain in history and social studies to fight poverty and homelessness, crime and discrimination, and make our nation more fair and more free. You’ll need the creativity and ingenuity you develop in all your classes to build new companies that will create new jobs and boost our economy.

We need every single one of you to develop your talents, skills and intellect so you can help solve our most difficult problems. If you don’t do that – if you quit on school – you’re not just quitting on yourself, you’re quitting on your country.

Now I know it’s not always easy to do well in school. I know a lot of you have challenges in your lives right now that can make it hard to focus on your schoolwork.

I get it. I know what that’s like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother who struggled at times to pay the bills and wasn’t always able to give us things the other kids had. There were times when I missed having a father in my life. There were times when I was lonely and felt like I didn’t fit in.

So I wasn’t always as focused as I should have been. I did some things I’m not proud of, and got in more trouble than I should have. And my life could have easily taken a turn for the worse.

But I was fortunate. I got a lot of second chances and had the opportunity to go to college, and law school, and follow my dreams. My wife, our First Lady Michelle Obama, has a similar story. Neither of her parents had gone to college, and they didn’t have much. But they worked hard, and she worked hard, so that she could go to the best schools in this country.

Some of you might not have those advantages. Maybe you don’t have adults in your life who give you the support that you need. Maybe someone in your family has lost their job, and there’s not enough money to go around. Maybe you live in a neighborhood where you don’t feel safe, or have friends who are pressuring you to do things you know aren’t right.

But at the end of the day, the circumstances of your life – what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at home – that’s no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude. That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher, or cutting class, or dropping out of school. That’s no excuse for not trying.

Where you are right now doesn’t have to determine where you’ll end up. No one’s written your destiny for you. Here in America, you write your own destiny. You make your own future.

That’s what young people like you are doing every day, all across America.

Young people like Jazmin Perez, from Roma, Texas. Jazmin didn’t speak English when she first started school. Hardly anyone in her hometown went to college, and neither of her parents had gone either. But she worked hard, earned good grades, got a scholarship to Brown University, and is now in graduate school, studying public health, on her way to being Dr. Jazmin Perez.
I’m thinking about Andoni Schultz, from Los Altos, California, who’s fought brain cancer since he was three. He’s endured all sorts of treatments and surgeries, one of which affected his memory, so it took him much longer – hundreds of extra hours – to do his schoolwork. But he never fell behind, and he’s headed to college this fall.

And then there’s Shantell Steve, from my hometown of Chicago, Illinois. Even when bouncing from foster home to foster home in the toughest neighborhoods, she managed to get a job at a local health center; start a program to keep young people out of gangs; and she’s on track to graduate high school with honors and go on to college.

Jazmin, Andoni and Shantell aren’t any different from any of you. They faced challenges in their lives just like you do. But they refused to give up. They chose to take responsibility for their education and set goals for themselves. And I expect all of you to do the same.

That’s why today, I’m calling on each of you to set your own goals for your education – and to do everything you can to meet them. Your goal can be something as simple as doing all your homework, paying attention in class, or spending time each day reading a book. Maybe you’ll decide to get involved in an extracurricular activity, or volunteer in your community. Maybe you’ll decide to stand up for kids who are being teased or bullied because of who they are or how they look, because you believe, like I do, that all kids deserve a safe environment to study and learn. Maybe you’ll decide to take better care of yourself so you can be more ready to learn. And along those lines, I hope you’ll all wash your hands a lot, and stay home from school when you don’t feel well, so we can keep people from getting the flu this fall and winter.

Whatever you resolve to do, I want you to commit to it. I want you to really work at it.

I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work — that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you’re not going to be any of those things.

But the truth is, being successful is hard. You won’t love every subject you study. You won’t click with every teacher. Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right this minute. And you won’t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.

That’s OK.  Some of the most successful people in the world are the ones who’ve had the most failures. JK Rowling’s first Harry Potter book was rejected twelve times before it was finally published. Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team, and he lost hundreds of games and missed thousands of shots during his career. But he once said, “I have failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

These people succeeded because they understand that you can’t let your failures define you – you have to let them teach you. You have to let them show you what to do differently next time. If you get in trouble, that doesn’t mean you’re a troublemaker, it means you need to try harder to behave. If you get a bad grade, that doesn’t mean you’re stupid, it just means you need to spend more time studying.

No one’s born being good at things, you become good at things through hard work. You’re not a varsity athlete the first time you play a new sport. You don’t hit every note the first time you sing a song. You’ve got to practice. It’s the same with your schoolwork. You might have to do a math problem a few times before you get it right, or read something a few times before you understand it, or do a few drafts of a paper before it’s good enough to hand in.

Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you need it. I do that every day. Asking for help isn’t a sign of weakness, it’s a sign of strength. It shows you have the courage to admit when you don’t know something, and to learn something new. So find an adult you trust – a parent, grandparent or teacher; a coach or counselor – and ask them to help you stay on track to meet your goals.

And even when you’re struggling, even when you’re discouraged, and you feel like other people have given up on you – don’t ever give up on yourself. Because when you give up on yourself, you give up on your country.
The story of America isn’t about people who quit when things got tough. It’s about people who kept going, who tried harder, who loved their country too much to do anything less than their best.

It’s the story of students who sat where you sit 250 years ago, and went on to wage a revolution and found this nation. Students who sat where you sit 75 years ago who overcame a Depression and won a world war; who fought for civil rights and put a man on the moon. Students who sat where you sit 20 years ago who founded Google, Twitter and Facebook and changed the way we communicate with each other.

So today, I want to ask you, what’s your contribution going to be? What problems are you going to solve? What discoveries will you make? What will a president who comes here in twenty or fifty or one hundred years say about what all of you did for this country?

Your families, your teachers, and I are doing everything we can to make sure you have the education you need to answer these questions. I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.

Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.

36 Responses to “Obama Speaks to the Children”

  1. Shannon Warren September 7, 2009 at 10:48 pm #

    One of my Facebook friends demanded to know who was going to be presenting the “alternate view” and if he, as a taxpayer, would be allowed in the school to watch the speech…first of all, do we need an alternate view to “work hard and stay in school?” REALLY?! And secondly, no, you will not be allowed in school because there was this thing call Columbine and this other thing called 9/11 and my KINDERGARTNER knows exactly what to do in the event of a lockdown and no, random people, conservative or liberal, will not be wandering the schools of NC (or anywhere else, I’m guessing) making sure the PRESIDENT that the majority of the voters in this country ELECTED doesn’t say anything about health care reform or cash for clunkers or even his wife wearing shorts IN THE SUMMER, MY GOD.

    And, it turns out, he’s telling the kids to work hard and stay in school and act right.

    GAH!

  2. Mike Walsh September 7, 2009 at 11:49 pm #

    You left out the parts where he described how he brought the troops home from the middle east and indicted a bunch of bankers…..

  3. Ward September 8, 2009 at 7:16 am #

    “Your families, your teachers, and I are doing everything we can to make sure you have the education you need to answer these questions. I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.”

    After I threw up a little in my mouth, I realized Mr. Obammy had been busy all Summer long, pulling ethernet cable through the ceiling and lugging cases of books for the chilluns to read. No wonder he didn’t have any time left to figure out the cost of government health care.

  4. [NO ANONYMOUS POSTERS. PICK A NAME. NEXT TIME I CHANGE THIS TO THE PART OF YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS BEFORE THE @ SIGN] September 8, 2009 at 7:52 am #

    “So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you.”

    How is this not indoctrination? It puts him in an position of power before the students. It makes them think that HE is the person responsible for what gets done in this country. It makes them think that HE is an authority figure to be looked up upon and trusted. It shines an almost paternal light upon his greatness.. Students are being taught to look to a government figure for guidance, not their parents, not their family, not successful businessmen, or scientists. A friggin bureaucrat.

  5. Mike Walsh September 8, 2009 at 9:00 am #

    “My Fellow Americans.

    Today you heard from our President, Barack Obama. Some of your parents voted for him, and most of the rest of the country voted for his opponent, John McCain.

    What you heard from President Obama today was a plea for you to pay attention in school and finish your education.

    What you did not hear from President Obama today was that your government, together with your school, has refused to provide you with the knowledge necessary for you to understand what has happened to this nation and its economy over the last 30 years.

    Let me be clear: In the last two years your mother, father, school teacher, grandma and grandpa have stuck each and every American with $10,000 in personal debt, and since 2000 the amount of debt you have had forced upon you has doubled.

    This debt was forced upon you not because of the need to defend this country from a foreign invader such as occurred on December 7th 1941 or because of the War on Terrorism, but rather because a bunch of greedy men and women on Wall Street and Washington DC, both Democrat and Republican, lied, cheated and stole money from ordinary Americans for more than a decade.

    You have undoubtedly been taught that stealing is wrong, and indeed, that if you steal you can go to jail. But you need to understand that the laws applies only to “little people” like you. If you work on Wall Street, own a fancy suit and private airplane, and steal millions and millions of dollars from people worldwide, instead of going to jail you will be rewarded with a huge bonus and be able to buy a really big boat, while the cost of your stealing will be forced on the children – and unborn – throughout America.

    That’s you, by the way.”

    http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1416-An-Address-To-Our-Schoolchildren.html

  6. The Humanist September 8, 2009 at 9:20 am #

    Between Ward’s ham-handed racism and Anonymous’ shock that the POTUS is an authority figure for the nation’s schoolchildren, I can’t imagine why anyone would think the opposition to President Obama delivering an inspirational message today to schoolchildren is anything more than sore-loserish, paranoid whining. (/snark)

  7. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 9:56 am #

    The whole thing isn’t a big deal because kids should learn how to see through political rhetoric.

    But it’s clear Obama’s intentions included partisan politicking, for example: I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

    Also, the original plan of the Dept of Ed to push for student writing assignments after the speech on the topic of “What I can do to help the President” sounded extremely political. Reportedly that was dropped only after public complaints last week.

    We’ll never know what additional partisan content the original version of the speech had that was scaled back after the complaints. Probably he would have liked to say more lines similar to the above – “I’m also working hard to do this, that, and the other thing for you, your family, the country, and the world, blah blah blah”.

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 10:02 am #

      But it’s clear Obama’s intentions included partisan politicking, for example: “I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

      I am unaware of a politician in recent memory who ran or governed or legislated on the “I’m slacking off to make sure you have crappy classrooms, no books, equipment, or computers”. So I’m sort of at a loss to figure out how (paraphrasing) “nice, well-equipped schools” is (direct quoting) “partisan politicking”.

      Also, the original plan of the Dept of Ed to push for student writing assignments after the speech on the topic of “What I can do to help the President” sounded extremely political. Reportedly that was dropped only after public complaints last week.

      In the speech, the President exhorts kids to do their best and reach their goals. It wasn’t about helping the President with a political agenda. It was about following through on what Obama asked them to do.

      We’ll never know what additional partisan content the original version of the speech had that was scaled back after the complaints. Probably he would have liked to say more lines similar to the above – “I’m also working hard to do this, that, and the other thing for you, your family, the country, and the world, blah blah blah”.

      From what I heard, he was expected to call for territorial expansion into the southern fringes of Canada, claiming it historically to be part of the United States. He also omitted his call to purge Jews from all governmental branches, and was going to announce his new “Strength through Joy” holiday camps for the working class.

  8. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 10:04 am #

    I wonder if there will be any complaints if a new president in September 2013 gives a speech and instead of Omaba’s “I’m working hard to…” line, says to students “I’m working hard to provide your parents with more choice about which school you attend.”

  9. Merr September 8, 2009 at 10:35 am #

    What happened when George H.W. Bush spoke to school children? Byron York tells us:

    Democrats, then the majority party in Congress, not only denounced Bush’s speech — they also ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate its production and later summoned top Bush administration officials to Capitol Hill for an extensive hearing on the issue. …
    The day after Bush spoke, the Washington Post published a front-page story suggesting the speech was carefully staged for the president’s political benefit. “The White House turned a Northwest Washington junior high classroom into a television studio and its students into props,” the Post reported.

    With the Post article in hand, Democrats pounced. “The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students,” said Richard Gephardt, then the House Majority Leader. “And the president should be doing more about education than saying, ‘Lights, camera, action.'”

    Democrats did not stop with words. Rep. William Ford, then chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, ordered the General Accounting Office to investigate the cost and legality of Bush’s appearance. On October 17, 1991, Ford summoned then-Education Secretary Lamar Alexander and other top Bush administration officials to testify at a hearing devoted to the speech.

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 10:41 am #

      @Merr, so what is your point? I didn’t invoke George H. W. Bush’s address to kids, nor Ronald Reagan’s. What relevance does it have, except to remind us that the Washington Post was once liberal?

  10. shim September 8, 2009 at 10:38 am #

    It’s no secret that I am not a huge fan of President Obama. However in his message to students he’s calling on them (along with their parents) to develop a sense of responsibility, to work hard, set goals, overcome adversity, never quit and become the best they can be. That’s a message that students need to hear more of and quite frankly I don’t care if they hear it from a republican, a democrat, male, female, a white person or a person of color. Early indications are that Obama and Education Secty Arne Duncan are on the right track when it comes to reforming education in this country. However the true test will come when they have to fight a real obstacle to reform…the powerful teachers unions to get some of their initiatives passed….

  11. Stephen September 8, 2009 at 11:12 am #

    Liberals, when they were in the minority, were all about the Fairness Doctrine, but now oppose it. Assuming this doesn’t get deleted, here is a dissenting view: http://politicalclassdismissed.com/?p=8312 .

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 11:23 am #

      @Stephen: What does the fairness doctrin have to do about anything? And your “dissenting view” is Godwinian silliness.

  12. Ward September 8, 2009 at 11:18 am #

    I guess Humanist (“ham-handed racism”) was similarly outraged at the pubescent play on words his friends used to use about the previous President’s surname. Or was he?

    As for Obama’s claim that his family was too poor for regular school, I believe he is largely (completely? I really don’t care enough about his life history to check) a product of private school education, start to finish–as are his children. So, what he’s not telling the chirren (sorry, Humanist) is, “… and maybe, someday after all my best efforts, the public schools you are sitting in will improve to the point that they’re worth my grandchildrens’ attending.”

  13. Mike Walsh September 8, 2009 at 11:38 am #

    I find it amusing how most of you ignore core economic issues and the way Obama has handled them. For all you progressives in favor of wealth redistribution, I guess from our children and grandchildren to Citibank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, etc. didn’t quite fit your vision. The silence is deafening.

  14. Stephen September 8, 2009 at 11:57 am #

    Sir, I find your reference to Godwin’s “Law” offensive. For millions of us, there is a belief that we should “never forget,” which Godwin’s Law implicitly tells the world to do. Godwin’s Law says, do not think, do not compare, do not remember, and worse, do not challenge, do not question. It is the worst of anti-intellectualism and collectivism combined, and anti-Semitic to boot. Further, by what right does Mike Godwin, or anyone else for that matter, have to be dictating law regarding thought crimes?

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 12:05 pm #

      Sir, I find your reference to Godwin’s “Law” offensive. For millions of us, there is a belief that we should “never forget,” which Godwin’s Law implicitly tells the world to do.

      Ooo, I love it when an Ostrowskiite gets all “Sir”. It means there’s seriousness and righteous indignation ahead!

      So, tell me Stephen – what is it about Hitler that we should never forget? The fact that he used the media of the day to his political ends? Or maybe it was the genocide of millions of Jews, Slavs, and other untermenschen. Godwin’s Law exhorts the online arguer to make or rebut a point without reverting to calling one’s opponent (or his views/position) a Nazi or Hitler. Pol Pot was like Hitler. Barack Obama isn’t.

      Godwin’s Law says, do not think, do not compare, do not remember, and worse, do not challenge, do not question. It is the worst of anti-intellectualism and collectivism combined, and anti-Semitic to boot. Further, by what right does Mike Godwin, or anyone else for that matter, have to be dictating law regarding thought crimes?

      Your cretinous post at Ostrowski’s silly little blog is a thought crime if ever there was one. When your entire blog post is based on a falsehood and something that “ostensibly” may happen, then you’ve pre-emptively lost your own argument. Kudos for that.

  15. The Humanist September 8, 2009 at 12:34 pm #

    Apparently, what Libertarians think we should not forget is that Hitler was a pacifist until those awful Allies forced him into war and that it’s A-OK to give editorial space to promote a racist anti-Semite’s thoughts on the subject

  16. Brian Castner September 8, 2009 at 12:45 pm #

    @ Alan: Merr’s point, of course, is that when Republican’s voice oppostion to Obama’s speech today, they are kooks, wackos, deranged, ignorant red necks Hitler-loving Birfers. When Dem’s object to #41, they are “liberals.” Do you believe in double-standards, or are you just enjoying the moment?

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 12:58 pm #

      @ Alan: Merr’s point, of course, is that when Republican’s voice oppostion to Obama’s speech today, they are kooks, wackos, deranged, ignorant red necks Hitler-loving Birfers. When Dem’s object to #41, they are “liberals.” Do you believe in double-standards, or are you just enjoying the moment?

      I wasn’t blogging in 1991, and don’t recall Bush’s speech from that time, so I honestly can’t tell you what my reaction was to Bush the first’s speech. But it doesn’t appear as if there was any sort of huge outcry about Bush indoctrinating kids or using kids in a political ploy. Some Democrats on Capitol Hill got pissed off? Whoopdy-doo.

      No one likened Bush I to Hitler or Mao or Stalin.

      So the double-standard quip would assume all things being equal. They aren’t, in this instance.

      Thankfully, however, Bush didn’t use the term “Negro” as Ronald Reagan did in 1989 in a speech to schoolkids.

  17. Stephen September 8, 2009 at 1:55 pm #

    No one was blogging in 1991. The HTML world wide web platform upon which blogging is built was still in the labs at CERN in 1991. Please notice that I notice that I can point this out without making any ad hominem attacks. I can also point out that the ’91 Bush address was indeed mentioned in the article you have been attacking so angrily, and to point out that it was mentioned unfavorably, which you neglect to mention here.

    I can also recognize that the White House was likely not directly involved in the production of the video, which was apparently not used in today’s address–as you said it wouldn’t be. As to whether that was changed as a result of public pressure, or because it never was planned to be, I suspect we cannot know. What we can know is that several schools had already shown this video in school assembles in run-up to the president’s address and that this contributed to the controversy. What is true, however, is that that some version of the I Pledge video did direct people to a White House-sponsored website, which easily could have lead to the misperception of intertwining activism.

    And therein may lie the problem. The Chief Executive is suppose to administer the country, not to be an activist. It matters not if that Chief Executive is named Obama or Bush. (Oh, and by the way, Reagan also abused the presidency as a bully-pulpit to reach into the schools as well, although it was in a much less coordinated fashion.)

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 2:04 pm #

      No one was blogging in 1991. The HTML world wide web platform upon which blogging is built was still in the labs at CERN in 1991. Please notice that I notice that I can point this out without making any ad hominem attacks. I can also point out that the ‘91 Bush address was indeed mentioned in the article you have been attacking so angrily, and to point out that it was mentioned unfavorably, which you neglect to mention here.

      Castner said there was a double-standard at play here, the subtext being that if this was a republican president I’d be all up in his shit about it. No one has proven that, and I deliberately omitted the past examples of Bush and Reagan because I find them to be beside the point. Is Castner arguing that GOPers are freaking on Obama because of a hissy fit on Capitol Hill that took place in 1991? I know revenge is a dish best served cold, but that particular dish got cold a decade ago.

      You also accuse me of ad hominem attacks. I did not attack your person. I attacked your post. I called it cretinous and idiotic. Which it is. I never said _you_ were anything, since I never heard of you before this morning.

      I can also recognize that the White House was likely not directly involved in the production of the video, which was apparently not used in today’s address–as you said it wouldn’t be. As to whether that was changed as a result of public pressure, or because it never was planned to be, I suspect we cannot know. What we can know is that several schools had already shown this video in school assembles in run-up to the president’s address and that this contributed to the controversy. What is true, however, is that that some version of the I Pledge video did direct people to a White House-sponsored website, which easily could have lead to the misperception of intertwining activism.

      What happened is that you read something somewhere on the internet and leaped to the conclusion that the “I Pledge” video was going to be shown to schoolkids. Not only was it not shown, as I said, but I never saw anyone, anywhere suggest that it was going to be shown today to schoolkids. It was a propaganda piece done by Obama supporters to promote Obama. Nothing at all wrong with that, per se. Just saying it would have been beyond foolish for the WH to use it in any way, shape, or form.

      And therein may lie the problem. The Chief Executive is suppose to administer the country, not to be an activist. It matters not if that Chief Executive is named Obama or Bush. (Oh, and by the way, Reagan also abused the presidency as a bully-pulpit to reach into the schools as well, although it was in a much less coordinated fashion.)

      If George W. Bush decided to broadcast a speech exhorting kids to work hard so they can achieve their life’s goals, I wouldn’t have a problem with it.

  18. The Humanist September 8, 2009 at 2:01 pm #

    @ Merr – what about what happened when George W. Bush spoke to schoolchildren…..er, on second thought, forget about it.

  19. Brian Castner September 8, 2009 at 2:33 pm #

    Just to be clear, the double standard refered to the general national hissy fit, not you in particular Pundit (although I see how you got that – sorry). I prefer to point out irony and hypocrisy, as I believe you enjoy the show (which I was alluding to). I am sure the same national politicians, R and Dem, were on the exact oppostie sides of this “debate” 18 years ago. I react to “the throng”: currently the throng and conventional wisdom say R’s are backward ignoramus’, and objecting to Obama telling school kids to work hard is the proof of that. 18 years ago, Dems were obviously the same for reacting the same way to the same idea. The double standard is national, not personal. And there is no way this is a reaction to 18 years ago – our nation can’t remember last week, much less #41’s presidency.

  20. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 3:24 pm #

    So I’m sort of at a loss to figure out how (paraphrasing) “nice, well-equipped schools” is (direct quoting) “partisan politicking”.

    BP – I was referring to the “I’m” in “I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

    For example, a nonpartisan alternative could be something like: “Officials of both parties at all levels of government for many years have been working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

    Or better yet: “Millions of Americans for many years have been working hard at their jobs to pay taxes needed to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 3:29 pm #

      BP – I was referring to the “I’m” in “I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

      For example, a nonpartisan alternative could be something like: “Officials of both parties at all levels of government for many years have been working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

      Or better yet: “Millions of Americans for many years have been working hard at their jobs to pay taxes needed to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.”

      He’s taking a conversational tone with the kids, not giving a political speech. Using “I’m” advances that tone a lot more than “officials of both parties”, which makes him sound like a doodyhead.

      Also, your “better yet” would lay a guilt trip on the kids. Also probably not what anyone was looking for.

  21. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 3:26 pm #

    It wasn’t about helping the President with a political agenda. It was about following through on what Obama asked them to do.

    If so, then the Dept of Ed used very strange wording in its plan as of last week for teachers across the country to assign “What I can do to help the President” as a writing topic for millions of students.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/02/wh-withdraws-call-students-help-obama/

    …Among the activities the government initially suggested for prekindergarten to sixth-grade students: that they “write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.” Another task recommended for students immediately after listening to the speech: to engage in a discussion about what “the president wants us to do.”

    …By Wednesday evening, the sentence asking children to think about how they can “help the president” had been replaced. The rewritten line said students should “write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short-term and long-term education goals. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals.” …

    • Alan Bedenko September 8, 2009 at 3:39 pm #

      Starbuck –

      As to the “what can I do to help the President” nonsense, let’s examine the speech and find spots where the President actually asked kids to do something.

      But at the end of the day, we can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, and the best schools in the world – and none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities. Unless you show up to those schools; pay attention to those teachers; listen to your parents, grandparents and other adults; and put in the hard work it takes to succeed.

      Gee, it’d be horrible if the kids wrote to the President promising to work hard, to listen to their elders and teachers, and to do what it takes to succeed.

      We need every single one of you to develop your talents, skills and intellect so you can help solve our most difficult problems. If you don’t do that – if you quit on school – you’re not just quitting on yourself, you’re quitting on your country.

      “Dear President Obama, I promise never to quit school, and to learn so that I may become successful, and that someday I might help find a cure for a disease”. That would be a socialist tragedy if some kid ever wrote that.

      But at the end of the day, the circumstances of your life – what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at home – that’s no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude. That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher, or cutting class, or dropping out of school. That’s no excuse for not trying.

      OMG the horror:

      That’s why today, I’m calling on each of you to set your own goals for your education – and to do everything you can to meet them. Your goal can be something as simple as doing all your homework, paying attention in class, or spending time each day reading a book. Maybe you’ll decide to get involved in an extracurricular activity, or volunteer in your community. Maybe you’ll decide to stand up for kids who are being teased or bullied because of who they are or how they look, because you believe, like I do, that all kids deserve a safe environment to study and learn. Maybe you’ll decide to take better care of yourself so you can be more ready to learn. And along those lines, I hope you’ll all wash your hands a lot, and stay home from school when you don’t feel well, so we can keep people from getting the flu this fall and winter.

      Whatever you resolve to do, I want you to commit to it. I want you to really work at it.

      I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work — that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you’re not going to be any of those things.

      And, at the end of the speech, the context within which the “Dear President Obama, here’s what I’m going to do to help you” comes into play:

      So today, I want to ask you, what’s your contribution going to be? What problems are you going to solve? What discoveries will you make? What will a president who comes here in twenty or fifty or one hundred years say about what all of you did for this country?

      Your families, your teachers, and I are doing everything we can to make sure you have the education you need to answer these questions. I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.

      Starbuck, I don’t generally always agree with your comments, but I always think they’re pretty rational and thought-out. Not in this instance, however.

      And frankly there are worse things a kid can do than write a letter to the President promising to work hard and excel.

  22. The Humanist September 8, 2009 at 5:34 pm #

    “Officials of both parties at all levels of government for many years have been working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn”

    Officials of both parties? Who are you trying to kid?

  23. BrianS September 8, 2009 at 6:41 pm #

    STOP saying: “when Bush 41 wanted to speak to kids, Democrats did this, this and this”

    AT NO POINT was their a groundswell to keep kids from seeing any Bush speech! That’s the difference! You have these conservative wackjobs actually treating the President as if he is some evil cult leader, How ironic, considering many of those same parents are blindly folloiwing the advise of Glenn Beck et al. And byt he way MIKE WALSH, you said “Today you heard from our President, Barack Obama. Some of your parents voted for him, and most of the rest of the country voted for his opponent, John McCain.” A little misleading, wouldn’t you say? You make it sound like the majority voted for the guy who LOST by over 7 million votes.

  24. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 7:06 pm #

    He’s taking a conversational tone with the kids,

    As the world’s best communicator, he can easily use conversational tone while avoiding guilt trips and not give himself or his administration sole credit for all that. Yes he can. If he wanted.

    At a minimum, he could have included his Chief Watchdog of Stimulus Spending in the credit hogging: “Joe Biden and I have been working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn.” (j/k)

    but I always think they’re pretty rational and thought-out. Not in this instance, however.

    If the critique is irrational, why would the Dept of Ed last week withdraw the directive in question? Doesn’t that mean they considered the criticism rational? Otherwise, why not proceed as planned?

    As I said way above, all this isn’t a big deal. Kids are exposed to politics their whole lives. A little more won’t hurt. Although not a big deal, there was some ego tripping partisanship in Obama’s speech to kids and in some of what his Dept of Ed tried to do as follow up. Negatives like those deserve to be pointed out.

  25. Starbuck September 8, 2009 at 7:10 pm #

    Officials of both parties? Who are you trying to kid?

    Humanist, Why would I try to kid anyone? Are you seriously unaware that the GWB’s proposed federal spending on education skyrocketed above Clinton’s level? Who’s kidding who?

    And that’s just federal. At the state level, haven’t R’s like Pataki, Bruno, Schwarzenegger, Huckabee, Romney and countless others all proposed big above-inflation state spending growth in education?

    Wouldn’t it be a much shorter list to try identifying Repub governors or legislative leaders in the past decade who didn’t support big hikes in education spending? Can you name any?

  26. Rogers September 8, 2009 at 8:39 pm #

    What a crock this all is. Haven’t we had enough of this guy’s speechifying? Now he has to go and give another one of his I’m your daddy speeches to the only segment of the population that ain’t got the ability to just turn that shit off. This has got about as much to do with heppin the children as reformin health care has to do with heppin they parents. It’s all ust snake oil sellin.

  27. indc September 8, 2009 at 11:29 pm #

    Bugs ya doesn’t it. All that speechifyig. Did you write for Bush2.

  28. Mike Walsh September 9, 2009 at 12:08 am #

    @indc:
    “This dark fantasy of a third Bush term is also an accurate portrait of Obama’s first term to date. In following Bush, Obama was given the opportunity either to restore the rule of law and the balance of powers or to firmly establish in place what were otherwise aberrant abuses of power. Thus far, President Obama has, in all the areas mentioned above, chosen the latter course. Everything described, from the continuation of crimes to the efforts to hide them away, from the corruption of corporate power to the assertion of the executive power to legislate, is Obama’s presidency in its first seven months. ” http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175109/david_swanson_the_more_things_change

Contribute To The Conversation